In West Virginia, on October 9, Governor Ray Tomblin introduced he was ordering state companies to act in compliance with the decision of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in ”Bostic v Schaefer” on the unconstitutionality of similar-sex marriage bans. In North Carolina, District Court Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr., ruling normally Synod of the United Church of Christ v. Cooper on October 10, 2014, struck down North Carolina’s ban on identical-intercourse marriage, citing the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in Bostic v. Schaefer. On January 25, Judge Granade stayed her ruling for 14 days to allow the state to hunt a longer stay from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Granade ruled in Searcy v. Strange that Alabama’s ban on similar-sex marriage was unconstitutional. Granade issued an injunction on May 21, 2015, clarifying that her order for similar-intercourse marriage utilized statewide. On March 3, 2015, the Alabama Supreme Court ordered all counties within the state to stop issuing marriage licenses to similar-sex couples. On January 1, 2015, after he had been challenged by some court clerks who believed he couldn’t use the case to require them to license similar-intercourse marriages, Judge Hinkle defined the scope of his injunction in Brenner v. Scott, writing that the Constitution slightly than his order authorizes all Florida clerks to situation licenses to same-sex couples and that while clerks are free to interpret his ruling in a different way they need to anticipate lawsuits if they fail to situation such licenses.
However, she stayed the ruling pending the result of Obergefell v. Hodges on the U.S. In May, the Guam District Court denied territorial officials’ request to delay the case until the Supreme Court dominated in Obergefell. Supreme Court agreed to hear 4 circumstances on appeal from the Sixth Circuit, consolidating them as one and setting a briefing schedule to be accomplished April 17. The cases have been: Obergefell v. Hodges (Ohio), Tanco v. Haslam (Tennessee), DeBoer v. Snyder (Michigan), and Bourke v. Beshear (Kentucky). Supreme Court declined to take motion on all five instances it had been asked to contemplate from appellate courts in the Fourth, Seventh, and Tenth Circuits, allowing the circuit court selections placing down marriage bans to stand. Colorado, Kansas, North Carolina, South Carolina, West Virginia, and Wyoming-but at first officials in South Carolina, Wyoming, and Kansas stated they would proceed to defend their states’ bans. In South Carolina, on November 12, U.S. In Wyoming, on October 17, U.S. On October 6, 2014, the U.S. On January 23, 2015 U.S. On January 16, the U.S. On November 7, a U.S. Montana. On November 19, 2014, U.S. March 19, he stayed it pending motion by the Sixth Circuit.
On March 26, Michigan Governor Rick Snyder stated the Sixth Circuit’s stay meant that “the rights tied to those marriages are suspended”. Idaho Governor Butch Otter announced the state would no longer attempt to preserve the state’s denial of marriage rights to same-intercourse couples, although he continued without success to seek assessment by the U.S. Alaska. On October 12, 2014, Judge Timothy M. Burgess dominated that Alaska’s denial of marriage rights to similar-sex couples was unconstitutional and issued an injunction to prevent state officials from persevering with to enforce it. Arizona Attorney General Tom Horne said the state would not enchantment the ruling and instructed county clerks to subject marriage licenses to same-intercourse couples. Hundreds of similar-intercourse couples obtained marriage licenses and a few married in Michigan on the morning of March 22 earlier than the appeals court docket temporarily stayed enforcement of the ruling. District Judge Scott Skavdahl dominated for the plaintiff identical-intercourse couples in Guzzo v. Mead, but stayed enforcement of his ruling until October 23 or until the defendants knowledgeable the court docket that they will not attraction to the Tenth Circuit.
Some began doing so based on their reading of Tenth Circuit precedent, others a number of weeks later on the idea on a ruling towards Kansas’ ban on similar-sex marriage issued on November 4, 2014, by U.S. A keep was denied by each the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals and the U.S. In Colorado, Attorney General John Suthers requested the Tenth Circuit to dismiss his attraction and carry its stay in Burns v. Hickenlooper. Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt’s failure to win a stay of that ruling from the Tenth Circuit and the U.S. He stayed enforcement of his ruling pending attraction, and the Attorney General introduced plans to enchantment to the Eighth Circuit. District Judge Kristine Baker struck down Arkansas’ ban on identical-intercourse marriage in Jernigan v. Crane, and she stayed enforcement of her ruling pending attraction. On July 1, a judge dominated in Love v. Beshear that Kentucky’s refusal to license similar-intercourse marriages was unconstitutional and stayed that ruling. District Judge John G. Heyburn declared Kentucky’s refusal to recognize similar-intercourse marriages from other jurisdictions unconstitutional. District Court judge dominated in Lawson v. Jackson County that Missouri’s ban on similar-intercourse marriage was unconstitutional.